UK HomeAcademicsAthleticsMedical CenterResearchSite IndexSearch UK

 

new faculty/fresh ideas
Sara Jo Nixon: Top Drug Abuse Researcher Now at UK

by Jeff Worley
Photos by Lee Thomas

Photo of Sara Jo NixonAsked what professional route she may have taken had she not become a psychology professor, Sara Jo Nixon doesn't hesitate. "You know," she says with a quiet laugh, "I've always wanted to be a conductor of an orchestra. Maybe it's the idea of having something all come together like it should."

We had just been discussing her role as head of a new multi-year project funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), focused on nicotine, neurocognition and substance abuse. "Now that I think of it," says Nixon, who came to the University of Kentucky last year from the University of Oklahoma, "being PI on a grant like this is kind of like conducting an orchestra. Every member of the team is essential, with each playing a separate but integrated part."

In orchestrating the NIDA project, Nixon draws on more than 15 years of experience working on the long-term effects of chronic substance abuse on neurocognitive and psychosocial functions, and on the connection between brain dysfunction and behavior. She has authored or co-authored over 125 journal articles and has been awarded over $4 million in grants, primarily from NIDA and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

Her current NIDA project began with the unlikely (and in some circles unpopular) premise that nicotine may have some positive effects for substance abusers.

"We know that a large percentage of alcoholics smoke—from 79 to 96 percent of them—but through the course of 40 years or so of abuse studies, that fact has been largely ignored," says Nixon. The strong correlation between substance abuse and smoking, the fact that nicotine has a direct effect on cognitive processes, and the widespread anecdotal evidence that people "feel more relaxed" and "work better" when they smoke led Nixon to hypothesize that there may be some compensation for substance abusers who smoke.

"We think that for alcohol- and drug-abusers, cigarettes may serve as a cognitive enhancer, somehow masking the negative effects of the other drugs in their system."

Nixon and her staff are currently trying to recruit 360 volunteers for a clinical trial to test her nicotine hypothesis. The majority of these will be former substance abusers. "Though they aren't using drugs now, it's a useful group for us to study because of the residual deficits in the brain after chronic substance use," Nixon explains. There will also be a control group.

"We'll be categorizing people based on which drugs they used, their age group and gender," she explains. "The volunteers will be subjected to various levels of the nicotine patch so we can look at a nicotine dose effect on tasks we ask them to perform." If it turns out that nicotine does, in fact, mask the effects of alcohol and hard drugs, this trial could lead to different clinical approaches for people in treatment.

"In some treatment programs, people are being encouraged to stop everything at once. Nicotine, too. If nicotine has been serving a compensatory function, actually helping them in some way to make better decisions than they would otherwise, and if nicotine is also taken away when these people are in withdrawal, then they should be in even worse shape and even less likely to be able to respond to treatment in a positive way," Nixon says. "So although we aren't arguing that people should be encouraged to smoke, we do think such a finding would argue for very aggressive substitution therapy in nicotine—patches or gum or whatever works for the particular person."

A second project, which may be even more time-intensive for Nixon and her staff, has to do with the effect of moderate drinking on older adults. "There's an ongoing and growing concern about older people who continue to drink socially. Is it safe for them to drink? To what extent does it affect their driving? A careful, empirical study of the effects of moderate doses of alcohol in older adults and then a systematic evaluation of their performance hasn't been done."

But it soon will be. Nixon currently heads up a pilot study in which people between 50 and 75 will be given low doses of alcohol and asked to do a short set of tasks. She and her staff will be looking at this group's performance and any significant differences among gender and specific age groups.

"We often hear that the aging population is more sensitive to alcohol. At the same time, we read that one to two drinks a day may be healthy. But do these two drinks affect a 50-year-old woman the same as they do a 75-year-old woman? What we want to do in this study is to be more precise about issues of sensitivity to alcohol for various subgroups of older people." As in her other major study, she and her staff are continuing to recruit volunteers for this trial.

Photo of Sara Jo NixonNixon's road to UK was an unusual one. Born and raised in Oklahoma, she received a B.S. in psychology at Southwestern Oklahoma State University, and her master's and Ph.D. degrees in experimental psychology at the University of Oklahoma. After a brief stint at Iowa State, she returned to the University of Oklahoma for an administrative position, which she held for four years.

Eager to get back into research, she joined the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences in 1987 and was promoted to associate professor two years later. In 2001 Nixon became a full professor at the University of Oklahoma and was awarded the Arnold and Bess Ungerman Endowed Chair in the psychiatry and behavioral sciences department, a rank and honor that usually equals academic permanence. So why did Nixon leave for UK?

"I've known some of the now associate professors in psychology here since they were grad students; I've been reviewing their work for years," Nixon explains. "I ran into Peter Giancola (associate professor of psychology at UK) at a conference, we sat down, and I found out just how much interesting work was going on here."

Nixon was recruited soon after, and decided to come to campus, give a talk, and have a look for herself at the activity under way in neuropsychology and substance abuse. "I was very impressed with the commitment of the department and college here to expand their focus on substance-abuse issues. Plus, I liked the collaborative nature of this department, and the terrific access to resources through, for example, the Sanders-Brown Center on Aging and the Imaging Center [Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy Center]," Nixon says. "At UK there's a commitment to this work at a philosophical level and a concrete level, and that was very exciting. So I came out—me and the dogs."

"Sara Jo Nixon was hired because she is a nationally recognized, senior researcher in substance abuse," says Robert Lorch, former acting chairman of psychology. "Our department hasn't hired senior faculty in the past, but we made an exception in Sara Jo's case because she is such an excellent fit with our faculty. She's vivacious, dynamic and energetic, and we anticipate that her experience will help elevate the stature of our research program to the point where it is recognized as one of the best in the nation."

The Murrah Federal Building Bombing

Asked to recall the most memorable event in her academic life, Sara Jo Nixon moves to the edge of her seat and says, "Oh, that's easy—University of Oklahoma, April 19, 1995.

"I was sitting in my office at 9:00—9:02 to be exact—when I heard a huge explosion and felt the windows of my office shake. I looked out a window and saw smoke. So my project coordinator, postdoctoral fellow and I jumped in the car and parked right across the street from the Murrah Federal Building," Nixon recalls. She says she and her team and some others were about to set up a MASH hospital for the wounded when they were alerted to the possibility of a second bomb, somewhere close.

"So we all started running away from that. I'd never run with a crowd of people who were literally running for their lives. Then the police would say, 'down!' and we'd get down," Nixon says. There turned out to be no second bomb, so Nixon returned to set up the on-site hospital.

After a couple of hours, she says, when only a few people had come in, she realized that the mortality rate was going to be high. The nine-story building had been blown into oblivion, leaving 168 people dead.

In the next few days Nixon fielded calls to the department from people locally and nationwide who wanted to do trauma research. And as director of clinical research at the time, it fell to Nixon to coordinate this research. "I had to sort out what people wanted to do and try to get them to work together to avoid duplication of effort."

Nixon and her staff, a few months later, did their own project on the mental health outcome of the firefighters who'd responded to the bombing, and she admits it was a challenging project that called for a lot of delicate handling. "First, it was tough to know what questions to ask. We'd had so little experience with this kind of thing on our soil—like none," says Nixon. As the project went on, Nixon gained even more admiration for the firefighters. "I thought their resiliency was awesome, a resiliency built on community and church support as well as local and national newspaper acclaim."